Skip to main content

Regulation vs. Regulation

The double-speak never ceases. Politicians on both sides can't seem to avoid talking about regulation and capitalism. Democrats afraid of appearing too socialist claim to uphold free enterprise principles but allow for safety nets and programs that take the excesses out of business cycles of boom and bust. Republicans afraid of appearing pro-greed claim to want to reduce only the onerous regulations, and keep only the "common sense" statutes.

I've always disliked the very term "common sense". It usually just means "I'm too lazy to actually think through the principles involved."

So on the subject of "regulation" let me quote the immortal Mandy Patinkin of Princess Bride fame: "Jhoo keep useen that wohrd. I donna think eet means whahtchew think eet means."

The problem is that when Conservatives talk about regulation, they mean the rules of order we need to keep competition fair in business. The laws that make cheating on earnings statements illegal, for example.

Liberals, Progressives, and Nancy Pelosi style Democrats aren't talking about rules of order when they talk about regulating capitalism. For them, regulation rather refers to rules to prevent what they consider too much winning--to moderate the very competition itself, regardless of how neutral and fair the rules of order already are.

It's a distinction with a difference, so let us listen and read carefully to understand which meaning our politicians are referencing.



So on the subject of "regulation" let me quote the immortal Mandy Patinkin of Princess Bride fame

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond the term “identity”

I didn't want to become one of those grad students who takes forever to find out what he wants to study, so I entered the Masters program at PITT with an idea what I wanted to do as a dissertation: national identity in the Ivory Coast. It sounds like a straightforward enough concept, but I encountered an article while I was taking a history course which looked at several case studies of the construction of racial, ethnic, and gender identities over a variety of geographical locations and historical periods that made me radically re-think the entire concept of identity . It's a concept that makes intuitive sense to most people, I would imagine. It means who you are, right? The layperson could also probably understand quite readily that there seem to be many different levels at which our "identity" can be determined or constrained. A black person may feel more of a racial component to identity than a white person, for example. My religious identity takes primacy over my...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ferguson Truth and Reconciliation

I can't hold it in any longer.  There has to be an outlet for what's been bottled up too long.  I've waited and waited to liberate the words.  The waiting required some discipline and strength, but now that I have the facts, the need to withhold judgment is past.  I kept an open mind, keeping suspicions carefully labeled as suspicions, and treating contrary opinions as possible.  But now, there's no more I can learn than the truth, so I must engage and I must submit to it.  It compels me to share, to address the fence-sitters in my audience to choose a side--the one the truth is on.  The one I'm on. There's a reason we have Grand Juries.  It's a system that evolved over time.  It doesn't guarantee that mistakes don't happen or that rigging the game doesn't occur.  But it does offer some structural guarantee that a filter passes between law enforcement and the judicial system.  It empowers ordinary citizens to review evidence an...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gas price "gouging"

Blogs are meant to be frequently updated, so I'm going to try to do a little (shorter) something every day even if it's not a complete treatment of the item in question. Today, I'm thinking that there's so much to get to with the PBS special that a radical shift of topic might be refreshing, so here goes… I recently had a liberal friend of mine forward me a canvassing email from www.moveon.org , a liberal political activist site, asking me to electronically sign a petition supporting an anti-price gouging bill that was in discussion in Congress at the time. The legislation, much to my dismay, was passed, but the email conversation with my friend would make a great cut and paste here. I have heavily edited the original email to refine my arguments, to take out elements that should remain personal, and continue to establish my own internet persona. If I decide to post his replies, I'll edit even more carefully so less personal and more generally useful arguments are m...
4 comments
Read more