Skip to main content

Nazi References and Free Speech

The mainstream media is having a little fun affirming its own role as thought-police with a ridiculous statement made on the floor of the House by Tennessee Democrat Representative comparing the tactics Republicans have used to (properly!) criticize the Obamacare bill to those used by Nazi propaganda mastermind Paul Joseph Goebbels.

Here are his words: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yG2hWFPLmZ4

Of course, even bringing up the Nazis has become so politically taboo that immediately Talk Radio condemned Rep. Cohen for comparing Republicans to Nazis. This he did NOT do. And in defending himself on CNN with Anderson Cooper, Cohen was quite right to insist that he wasn't comparing the morally repugnant Nazis with his political opponents the Republicans. Instead he attempted to be careful--and his logic is flawless in this--about re-affirming that it was the (in his mind) dishonest propaganda tactic he was condemning, not the politicians.

Here's his interview on CNN: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/anderson-cooper-has-frustrating-exchange-with-nazi-comparing-rep/

Anderson Cooper, of course, kept hammering on the point that any comparison with the Nazis immediately brings up associations. It's automatically the worst possible example of evil anything to talk about Nazis, in Anderson's view, so that making such comparisons, correctly or not, is automatically incendiary, and thus participates in an undesirable polarization and unnecessary heating of political rhetoric that can inspire crazies to shoot innocent people in the name of hatred.

The problem is, that Anderson Cooper isn't and should never be the arbiter of what is proper. The problem is that Rep. Cohen should have free reign to express his opinion in any way he sees fit. The problem is that being truthful must always trump being inoffensive if real problems are to be honestly addressed and rectified.

Now I'm in complete disagreement with Cohen on the direction of Obamacare. He is dead wrong that Republicans are falsely characterizing the bill as a government takeover of the health care sector of the economy. Of course the bill doesn't ENACT such a takeover, but the unavoidable consequences of such a bill would eventually have that effect, and Cohen can't be ignorant of this.

However, Cohen is right about one thing and one thing only: finding a concise resounding "big lie" and repeating it until it’s believed is the tactic Goebbels is famous for. I find NOTHING WRONG in using the most famous example you can think of to illustrate whatever point you're trying to make. And there's a SPECIAL interest we should ALL take in familiarizing ourself with the Nazi examples. Those are the ones we should understand the BEST so that we don’t REPEAT their genocidal errors in our society.

The problem isn’t that Cohen misunderstands the tactic of Goebbels. The problem is that he’s wrong about the CONTENT of the “big lie” he’s calling out. Republicans have told the TRUTH about Obamacare, and it's the Democrats who have been using Goebbels’ tactics to hide it.

Fellow conservatives, please don’t fall into the PC trap of: 1. Trying to claim any and all Nazi references should be banned; 2. Trying to claim that any reference to any Nazi anywhere automatically burdens the specific charge of the reference with the full and entire weight of evil associated with the Nazis.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond the term “identity”

I didn't want to become one of those grad students who takes forever to find out what he wants to study, so I entered the Masters program at PITT with an idea what I wanted to do as a dissertation: national identity in the Ivory Coast. It sounds like a straightforward enough concept, but I encountered an article while I was taking a history course which looked at several case studies of the construction of racial, ethnic, and gender identities over a variety of geographical locations and historical periods that made me radically re-think the entire concept of identity . It's a concept that makes intuitive sense to most people, I would imagine. It means who you are, right? The layperson could also probably understand quite readily that there seem to be many different levels at which our "identity" can be determined or constrained. A black person may feel more of a racial component to identity than a white person, for example. My religious identity takes primacy over my...

Ferguson Truth and Reconciliation

I can't hold it in any longer.  There has to be an outlet for what's been bottled up too long.  I've waited and waited to liberate the words.  The waiting required some discipline and strength, but now that I have the facts, the need to withhold judgment is past.  I kept an open mind, keeping suspicions carefully labeled as suspicions, and treating contrary opinions as possible.  But now, there's no more I can learn than the truth, so I must engage and I must submit to it.  It compels me to share, to address the fence-sitters in my audience to choose a side--the one the truth is on.  The one I'm on. There's a reason we have Grand Juries.  It's a system that evolved over time.  It doesn't guarantee that mistakes don't happen or that rigging the game doesn't occur.  But it does offer some structural guarantee that a filter passes between law enforcement and the judicial system.  It empowers ordinary citizens to review evidence an...

Gas price "gouging"

Blogs are meant to be frequently updated, so I'm going to try to do a little (shorter) something every day even if it's not a complete treatment of the item in question. Today, I'm thinking that there's so much to get to with the PBS special that a radical shift of topic might be refreshing, so here goes… I recently had a liberal friend of mine forward me a canvassing email from www.moveon.org , a liberal political activist site, asking me to electronically sign a petition supporting an anti-price gouging bill that was in discussion in Congress at the time. The legislation, much to my dismay, was passed, but the email conversation with my friend would make a great cut and paste here. I have heavily edited the original email to refine my arguments, to take out elements that should remain personal, and continue to establish my own internet persona. If I decide to post his replies, I'll edit even more carefully so less personal and more generally useful arguments are m...