Skip to main content

Choice and Faith vs. the veil

Pres. Monson on Choice:

"Although in our journey we will encounter forks and turnings in the road, we simply cannot afford the luxury of a detour from which we may never return."

"I plead with you to make a determination right here, right now, not to deviate from the path which will lead to our goal: eternal life with our Father in Heaven."

"Ye shall not turn aside to the right hand or to the left. Ye shall walk in all the ways which the Lord your God hath commanded you." (citing Moses in Deuteronomy)


Detours, deviations, turning to the right or left. The metaphor of the path chosen, and the consequences which inevitably accompany the choice can't be stressed enough. You pick up one end of a stick, you've also got the other end.


The problem is that with the veil in place (LDS terminology for necessary forgetting an immortal spirit goes through as part of the process of its coming to a test in mortality) all paths are necessarily blind ones. So how does one know what the consequences of any given path will be so as to make an informed choice?


The answer is that none of us are smart enough to FULLY realize ALL of the results of ANY of our choices. That makes the choice of path to eternity totally a matter of faith. And ENOUGH is given to us to get ENOUGH of it right to get us set off on the right path. Because causes DO have their effects, whether or not we believe in them, or understand them. The trick is to make it a goal to find out for oneself what path is the correct one. Once THAT testimony is acquired, it's a simple matter of acting as if it's true. The claims made about the results of righteous living can be tested quite easily.


If any man will ado his bwill, he shall cknow of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or whether I speak of myself.


I have faith that God is ultimately a God of fairness. I don't know how it's all going to work out, but despite all the unfairness there seems to be out there in the world, I trust that He knows how to make sure each of us individually get an exactly FAIR judgment. That trust enables me to personally put up with a TON of static, because I can act as if ALL of it is ultimately only temporary, and that NONE of it is too much for me to handle. It also provides me with an explanatory theory for evil in the world: it's part of the test, some people choose wrong, and some innocent people suffer for it, but there WILL be, at some point, complete, total and ultimate fairness for both the victims and the perpetrators.


A lot of assumptions stacked on top of each other? Not really, just one: I assume Christ is who He claimed to be as is recorded in Scripture. The rest follows logically, as all truth will. My tests of faith have confirmed these truths along the way also.



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gas price "gouging"

Blogs are meant to be frequently updated, so I'm going to try to do a little (shorter) something every day even if it's not a complete treatment of the item in question. Today, I'm thinking that there's so much to get to with the PBS special that a radical shift of topic might be refreshing, so here goes… I recently had a liberal friend of mine forward me a canvassing email from www.moveon.org , a liberal political activist site, asking me to electronically sign a petition supporting an anti-price gouging bill that was in discussion in Congress at the time. The legislation, much to my dismay, was passed, but the email conversation with my friend would make a great cut and paste here. I have heavily edited the original email to refine my arguments, to take out elements that should remain personal, and continue to establish my own internet persona. If I decide to post his replies, I'll edit even more carefully so less personal and more generally useful arguments are m...
4 comments
Read more

Ron Paul and Foreign Entanglements

Ron Paul Photo from: http://www.ronpaul2008.com/about/ Sean Hannity photo from: http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/150507_ron_paul_debate.html I like Congressman and former multiple-election Libertarian party presidential candidate Ron Paul . I do. I admire him for his straight talk, and even more for the fact that he actually does walk it too. I had a conversation with a brother of mine (who I respect immensely and who has researched and thought through many of the aspects of his affiliation with Ron Paul's ideals) at our family reunion recently that helped me understand what appeal he might have in the Republican primary. So between that and a recent Michael Medved interview with him, where he answered so frankly and unapologetically that I almost had a hard time reminding myself that this was a politician, I think it's time I finally address his candidacy and policy positions. First, I espouse the fundamental libertarian ideals on most issues. I think Ron Paul is right on...
3 comments
Read more

The Non-Polygamous LDS Family and Questionable Historians

Excuse me a little bold language here, without meaning to be harsh, but firm: I have serious doubts as to the qualifications of the historians cited in the PBS special "the Mormons". The same guy who claimed that there was no archeological evidence either for the story of the Exodus or for the Book of Mormon (topic I dealt with here ), made the fantastic claim that the 1830s in America were a time of crisis for the nuclear family. After an hour on various Google searches, I can find no evidence to substantiate that claim. Gold rushes around that time period DID cause a number of families in the East to be more or less temporarily broken, but I don't believe census records on the number of households containing nuclear families reduced so drastically as to support the idea that Joseph Smith's insistence on the sealing of families could be reasonably seen as a reaction to it. And the other female historian makes the nonsensical claim that the question of the celestial s...
1 comment
Read more