Skip to main content

Tv Edit Tripe




A quick internet search to see if there's an "Edited for TV" version of Back to the Future available to show Everett anywhere, and...nope.
There's legit versions everywhere, bootleg versions everywhere, but evidently no one would rather hear Marty McFly say "Jeez Louise" instead of something profane.
Actually, there ARE tons of us out here, but copyright laws have been interpreted in court decisions that make it darn near impossible to get one.
You can own the movie and edit it yourself.
You can't own the movie and pay someone else to edit it.
You can buy software that edits language out on the fly.
You can't buy software that permanently creates an edited copy for you to enjoy and re-use at your leisure.
It's nuts!
But the thing I hate worst about it is the sanctimonious tripe about the Director's artistic purity that they claim is the reason for such idiotic legal "protections". And this is coming from an art CRITIC (me), who should normally hold such attitudes sacrosanct.
Who do you think made the decision to offer the film on TV in the first place? Don’t you think they find SOME benefit to offering their art to a broader audience? They may chafe at the edits, but they DO it anyway, and they don’t mind the royalty check from the stations. If you’re taking their argument of artistic purity at face value, you’re falling for a lie. It’s not wrong, it exposes them. If they truly had a problem with the concept of public decency, they would never allow their movie to get played on TV where public decency standards exist. The fact that they don’t object proves their problem is selective in its application. They know what they've created is indecent, but want to believe being profane/obscene is somehow more "real" or somehow conveys their "message" better.

Of course there are adult situations that ARE integral to a plot, "message", etc. I'm just talking about the gratuitous stuff here. Back to the Future gains absolutely nothing by any of the multiple swear words in its script except when Marty tells his dad to swear "damnit". Public decency standards are good. Release edited versions and see how the market rewards you.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond the term “identity”

I didn't want to become one of those grad students who takes forever to find out what he wants to study, so I entered the Masters program at PITT with an idea what I wanted to do as a dissertation: national identity in the Ivory Coast. It sounds like a straightforward enough concept, but I encountered an article while I was taking a history course which looked at several case studies of the construction of racial, ethnic, and gender identities over a variety of geographical locations and historical periods that made me radically re-think the entire concept of identity . It's a concept that makes intuitive sense to most people, I would imagine. It means who you are, right? The layperson could also probably understand quite readily that there seem to be many different levels at which our "identity" can be determined or constrained. A black person may feel more of a racial component to identity than a white person, for example. My religious identity takes primacy over my...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gas price "gouging"

Blogs are meant to be frequently updated, so I'm going to try to do a little (shorter) something every day even if it's not a complete treatment of the item in question. Today, I'm thinking that there's so much to get to with the PBS special that a radical shift of topic might be refreshing, so here goes… I recently had a liberal friend of mine forward me a canvassing email from www.moveon.org , a liberal political activist site, asking me to electronically sign a petition supporting an anti-price gouging bill that was in discussion in Congress at the time. The legislation, much to my dismay, was passed, but the email conversation with my friend would make a great cut and paste here. I have heavily edited the original email to refine my arguments, to take out elements that should remain personal, and continue to establish my own internet persona. If I decide to post his replies, I'll edit even more carefully so less personal and more generally useful arguments are m...
4 comments
Read more

Abortion "Complexities" and Morality

It's just not that hard, folks.  Unless we're dealing with the context of a justified war, there's simply no moral defense for killing innocent humans if there are any other options, let alone for the convenience of the living.  And while both sides may exaggerate to make a point, only one side of the argument does insane logical backflips to hide the true and morally repugnant nature of the acts, their numbers, their consequences, and the assumptions underlying their "justifications". Ever since the leaked Alito draft hinting that Roe v. Wade was about to be overturned, pro-abortion activists have had their day.  I suppose I can understand a certain need to defend against what they perceive as a threat on their liberties and rights.  So now that they've had their time to externalize their fears and put out ad campaigns, and fake being handcuffed at protests in unlawful locations, let's stand back from the emotions and just examine the core moral argument...
Post a Comment
Read more